P.H. Waszink - Construction Consultant

PROJECT EXAMPLES
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Upon request, PHW-CC will prepare and issue confidential copies of representative, pertinent sample work product from past consultancies, which may be useful understanding the range of approaches available in dealing with a given project.  We share such work samples with the understanding that no two consultancies, projects or sets of conditions are the same.  Frequently, it is the discovery or searching-out of exceptional aspects of a given project and their impacts -- and the full and clear communication among team members of such aspects -- that can spell the difference between readiness, accuracy and other survival-related positives on the one hand, and   a wide range of problems, including unacknowledged exposures, that can lead to eventual losses or various negatives on the other.

While most samples consist of construction project or case cost-related work product, including:   

  New construction
  Rehab or adaptive re-use
  Incremental design-sequence
  Pre-bid cross-check, remedial program (construction defects)
  Dispute (mediation, arbitration or trial)
  Replacement cost, feasibility study & conceptual study 

PHW-CC work product also on occasion encompasses all-text reports or other non-estimate formats, including planning tools for use among a project or case team as to strategy or distribution of responsibilities, or with a homeowners' association to clarify a remedial project, its necessary roles and its impacts.


EXAMPLE #1
1997-2001, SAN FRANCISCO THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY, SAN ANSELMO:

(A) 1997-98,  Feasibility Study Technical Support Services for Proposed Lower Campus Learning Center and Related Sub-Projects (including Support for Long-Term Capital Program Planning for +/-$35 Million in Programs Campus-wide).

(B) 1998-2000,  Project Management Services for Proposed Repair / Retrofit & Adaptive Re-Use Project for Two Historic Stone Buildings ($11 Million Budget; Currently under construction). Related Prioritized Projects in Other Buildings on Campus including Related Infrastructure Tasks (Proposed $2.5 Million Budget); includes Fundraising Campaign Support; Design Phase, Constructibility,  Contractor Selection Process & Construction Phase Support. 

REFERENCES:  Glady given upon request.

EXAMPLE #2 
1994-Present,  FETZER VINEYARDS, Hopland & Paso Robles, CA:

(A) 1994-97 -- MULTI-PROJECT, PHASED DESIGN and CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES CONSOLIDATION & RELOCATION PROGRAM:  +/- $28 Million Program (at Full Value / Normal Delivery Methods) Completed for +/- $17 Million on an Owner / Builder Design / Build Basis

(B) 1998-Present - Construction Cost Planning for Selected Projects in Hopland and Paso Robles

REFERENCES:  Glady given upon request.


EXAMPLE #3
1994-2003, FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) -- Multiple Cost Issue Related Roles RE: Seismic Repair/Retrofit/Replacement, via Multiple Prime Technical Assistance Contractors to FEMA:

(A) Consulting-Basis Construction Industry Technical Lead for GRANT ACCELERATION PROGRAM Methodology Development (advisor on National Policy Revisions RE: Accelerated Settlements based on Modifying Disaster Survey Report Budget Preparation Procedures including Risk Factors and Contingencies).

(B) Appeal Response Team Resource Consultant RE: Development of Alternative Technical  Scheme Scope and Probable-Construction-Costs Analyses. 

(C) Disaster Survey Report Budgeting Support Services Provider.

SAMPLE (Seismic Retrofit/ Repair or Replacement) PROJECTS: San Francisco City Hall, $62 Million or $104 Million FEMA alternatives developed v.  $188 Million claimed by Applicant; Los Angeles City Hall, $17 Million verifiable scope & costs v. $187 Million claimed by Applicant; Los Angeles County / U.S.C. Medical Center (Psychiatric Hospital: $6.8 Million FEMA alternative developed v. $64 Million claimed, and: Pediatrics Pavilion: $10.1 Million FEMA alternative developed v. $82 Million claimed); Cedars Sinai Medical Center, The Halper Building, $3.7 Million FEMA alternative developed v. $18 Million claimed.

REFERENCE:  Glady given upon request.


EXAMPLE #4 
1994-95, OLD ADOBE UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT -- PREPARE TWO ITERATIONS of a MENU of DISTRICT REPAIR & RENOVATION ITEMS for EVALUATION
RE: SCHOOL BOND ELECTION: Phase I = $10 Million; Phase II = $18 Million

REFERENCE:  Glady given upon request.

EXAMPLE #5 
1993-94, CONSULTANCIES RE: UNITED AIRLINES / OAKLAND for GORDON H. CHONG + ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS, San Francisco: $48-$62 Million

REFERENCES:  Glady given upon request.


EXAMPLE #6
1985-91 DELANCEY STREET FOUNDATION MIXED-USE PROJECT: 440,000 SQUARE-FOOT "SOUTH BEACH TRIANGLE": $28 Million Value "Sweat Equity" Project / Under $11 Million Actual Cost.

REFERENCE:  Glady given upon request.


EXAMPLE #7 
1988-90, EPISCOPAL HOMES FOUNDATION -- SAN FRANCISCO TOWERS, 250-UNIT LIFE CARE FACILITY: $65 Million New Construction Project.
 

EXAMPLE #8  
1990, RESTORATION, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS / POST OFFICE BUILDING, SEVENTH & MISSION STREETS, SAN FRANCISCO: $85 Million Program.
 

EXAMPLE #9 
1983-4, COST CONSULTANT TO STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION: CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT, SAN QUENTIN PRISON: $785 Million (Low Range) to $1.4 Billion.

REFERENCES:  Glady given upon request.

EXAMPLE #10 
BUDGETING for NON-PROFIT HOUSING CORPORATIONS:

  1995-96, REHABILITATION/ADAPTIVE RE-USE PROJECTS for MERCY CHARITIES HOUSING / CALIFORNIA : The Rose Hotel, $2.6 Million; Richmond Hills Family Center, $700,000; Peter Claver Community, $450,000; in San Francisco.

  1995, COMMUNITY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP:  The Iroquois Residence, San Francisco: $2.2 Million.

  1994, HOUSING DEVELOPMENT & NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION CORPORATION:  Seventh & Natoma Family Apartments Project (Rental Units): $4.1 Million.

  1990-91, HOUSING CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: Phelan Loop Affordable  Senior Housing Project: $16 Million.

  1989-90, SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: Lady Shaw Center (Built on Air Rights Over Broadway Tunnel): $6.2 Million; Pre-Development Services + Constr. Phase Owner's Rep. through CEDEVCO.

REFERENCE:  Glady given upon request.


EXAMPLE #11 
1964-Present, ACCUMULATED EXPERIENCE & EXPERTISE IN RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION AS A DESIGN / BUILDER, GENERAL CONTRACTOR, OWNER / BUILDER, DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANT, COST PLANNER, AND FORENSIC EXPERT.

REFERENCES:  Glady given upon request.


Back to Waszink main page